A. Bouquet
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anne‐Françoise Adam‐BlondonLaurent TorregrosaJ. KaplanP. ThisIan B. DryJérôme PauquetC.A. SavoyYves Danglot
- Topics
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research (18 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers)
In The Last Decade
A. Bouquet
49 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Plant Science 854
- Molecular Biology 376
- Food Science 345
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 269
- Cell Biology 249
Countries citing papers authored by A. Bouquet
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Bouquet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Bouquet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Bouquet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Bouquet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Bouquet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Bouquet. The network helps show where A. Bouquet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Bouquet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Bouquet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Bouquet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Bouquet. A. Bouquet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 139 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 172 | |
| 7 | 128 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Towards obtaining grapevine varieties resistant to powdery and downy mildews by conventional breeding and biotechnology. | 3 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 94 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Research on resistant rootstocks: a new way of controlling grapevine fanleaf virus. | 1 |
| 18 | Vitis X Muscadinia hybridization as a method of introducing resistance characters into the cultivated vine by introgression, and the cytogenetic and taxonomic problems it presents. | 1 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About A. Bouquet
A. Bouquet is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (18 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (89 citations), Plant Science (854 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (269 citations). A. Bouquet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anne‐Françoise Adam‐Blondon, Laurent Torregrosa, J. Kaplan, P. This, Ian B. Dry, Jérôme Pauquet, C.A. Savoy, Yves Danglot, Tamzin M. Donald and Thomas Martyn. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Nuclear Physics B and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.