Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

870 papers and 20.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 870 papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 20.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing usually cover General Health Professions (533 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (240 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (197 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (306 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (237 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing are Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Maureen Dobbins, Donna Ciliska, Betsy Thomas, Ellen Fineout‐Overholt, Lynn Gallagher‐Ford, Debra Bick, Ian D. Graham, Helen Hall and Ashleigh E. Butler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025