Population Space and Place

1.3k papers and 29.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Population Space and Place in the last decades have received a total of 29.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Population Space and Place usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers), Demography (527 papers) and General Health Professions (192 papers) specifically the topics of Migration and Labor Dynamics (670 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (393 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (279 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Population Space and Place are Russell King, Parvati Raghuram, Thomas J. Cooke, Keith Halfacree, Clara H. Mulder, Thomas Faist, Jianfa Shen, Aileen Stockdale, Biao Xiang and Allan M. Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Population Space and Place

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Population Space and Place. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Population Space and Place.

Countries where authors publish in Population Space and Place

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Population Space and Place. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Population Space and Place with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population Space and Place more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025