Countries where authors publish in Population Space and Place
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Population Space and Place. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Population Space and Place with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population Space and Place more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Population Space and Place
This network shows the impact of papers published in Population Space and Place. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Population Space and Place.
About Population Space and Place
The 1.4k papers published in Population Space and Place in the last decades have received a total of 33.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Population Space and Place usually cover Demography (558 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers) and Urban Studies (131 papers) specifically the topics of Migration and Labor Dynamics (696 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (415 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (300 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (199 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (175 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (136 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (127 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Population Space and Place are Russell King, Parvati Raghuram, Thomas J. Cooke, Keith Halfacree, Thomas Faist, Clara H. Mulder, Jianfa Shen, Aileen Stockdale, Biao Xiang and Allan M. Williams.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.