Chemoecology

848 papers and 20.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 848 papers published in Chemoecology in the last decades have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Chemoecology usually cover Insect Science (467 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (414 papers) and Plant Science (283 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (293 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (282 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (199 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chemoecology are Caroline Müller, Stephen B. Malcolm, John H. Borden, Michaël Wink, Kenneth F. Raffa, Sebastian E. W. Opitz, Susanna Andersson, Thomas M. Lewinsohn, Juha‐Pekka Salminen and Thomas Eisner.

In The Last Decade

Chemoecology

817 papers receiving 18.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Chemoecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chemoecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chemoecology.

Countries where authors publish in Chemoecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chemoecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chemoecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemoecology more than expected).

A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) 2004 2026 2011 2018 262
  1. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) (2004)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026