First World War Studies

261 papers and 403 indexed citations i.

About

The 261 papers published in First World War Studies in the last decades have received a total of 403 indexed citations. Papers published in First World War Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (155 papers), Sociology and Political Science (113 papers) and History (69 papers) specifically the topics of World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (99 papers), European history and politics (42 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in First World War Studies are Hew Strachan, Julie Anderson, Sonya O. Rose, Michael S. Neiberg, Stuart Hallifax, Julia F. Irwin, Leo van Bergen, Jessica Meyer, Davide Rodogno and Mónika Baár.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in First World War Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in First World War Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in First World War Studies.

Countries where authors publish in First World War Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in First World War Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in First World War Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites First World War Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025