Countries where authors publish in Ural Historical Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ural Historical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ural Historical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ural Historical Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Ural Historical Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ural Historical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ural Historical Journal.
About Ural Historical Journal
The 356 papers published in Ural Historical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 486 indexed citations . Papers published in Ural Historical Journal usually cover Archeology (13 papers), Paleontology (59 papers), Archeology (66 papers), Demography (55 papers) and Anthropology (43 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (59 papers), Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (53 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (43 papers), Soviet and Russian History (24 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (22 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (22 papers), Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia (18 papers) and Marine and environmental studies (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ural Historical Journal are В. В. Ткачев, Andrey Epimakhov, С. В. Богданов, Mikhail A. Kiselev, Marina K. Karapetian, Marianna Kulkova, А.Yu. Fedorchenko, Bente Philippsen, Elena Borodinа and Paul W. Werth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.