Ural Historical Journal

335 papers and 400 indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Ural Historical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 400 indexed citations. Papers published in Ural Historical Journal usually cover Political Science and International Relations (71 papers), Sociology and Political Science (63 papers) and Archeology (63 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (55 papers), Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (52 papers) and Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ural Historical Journal are В. В. Ткачев, Andrey Epimakhov, С. В. Богданов, Marina K. Karapetian, Elena Borodinа, А.Yu. Fedorchenko, Paul W. Werth, Marianna Kulkova, Mikhail A. Kiselev and Bente Philippsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ural Historical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ural Historical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ural Historical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Ural Historical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ural Historical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ural Historical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ural Historical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025