Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

9.6k papers and 127.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.6k papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 127.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience usually cover Neurology (4.2k papers), Surgery (2.5k papers) and Epidemiology (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (1.1k papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (1.0k papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (925 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience are Andrew H. Kaye, Ralph J. Mobbs, Frank Vajda, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld, Helen V. Danesh‐Meyer, Stanley S. Stylli, Katharine J. Drummond, M. Morgan, Hugues Duffau and Tipu Z. Aziz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Clinical Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025