World Customs Journal

257 papers and 885 indexed citations

About

The 257 papers published in World Customs Journal in the last decades have received a total of 885 indexed citations. Papers published in World Customs Journal usually cover Political Science and International Relations (70 papers), Accounting (59 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (56 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (49 papers), Law, logistics, and international trade (47 papers) and World Trade Organization Law (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Customs Journal are Andrew Grainger, David A. Widdowson, Stephen Holloway, Gautam Basu, Ruth Banomyong, Gareth Lewis, Ari‐Pekka Hameri, Shingo Matsuda, Juha Hintsa and Thomas K. Doyle.

In The Last Decade

World Customs Journal

145 papers receiving 469 citations

Fields of papers published in World Customs Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Customs Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Customs Journal.

Countries where authors publish in World Customs Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Customs Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Customs Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Customs Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026