The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language AssociationUnited States
Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media StudiesUnited States
Oxford Art JournalUnited Kingdom
Communication and Critical/Cultural StudiesUnited States
Woman s Art JournalUnited Kingdom
ManaBrazil
Visual Anthropology ReviewUnited States
The Journal of American CultureUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory
Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory · 1×
×1.31.6kSPS
×0.9573GS
×0.7358CS
×0.5154MUSIC
×0.6201VAPA
Citations per year, relative to Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory
Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory
This network shows the impact of papers published in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.