Countries where authors publish in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology.
About Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology
The 319 papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology usually cover Aging (33 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (23 papers) and Cell Biology (55 papers) specifically the topics of Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (76 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (40 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology are Nobuyuki Itoh, David M. Ornitz, Hector Macias, Lindsay Hinck, Peter W. H. Holland, Liliana Attisano, Alexander Weiß, James T. Kadonaga, Lisa Maves and Jared C. Talbot.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.