Psychophysiology

6.7k papers and 325.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.7k papers published in Psychophysiology in the last decades have received a total of 325.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychophysiology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (4.4k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2.3k papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1.2k papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychophysiology are Peter J. Lang, Emanuel Donchin, Margaret M. Bradley, James J. Gross, Risto Näätänen, Greg Hajcak, John T. Cacioppo, Ray Johnson, Albert Kok and Paul A. Obrist.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychophysiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychophysiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychophysiology.

Countries where authors publish in Psychophysiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychophysiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychophysiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychophysiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025