Waste and Biomass Valorization

3.8k papers and 55.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization in the last decades have received a total of 55.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.5k papers), Molecular Biology (649 papers) and Building and Construction (619 papers) specifically the topics of Biofuel production and bioconversion (728 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (395 papers) and Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (347 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Waste and Biomass Valorization are Ange Nzihou, Paul T. Williams, J.S.J. van Deventer, Myrto‐Panagiota Zacharof, Youjiang Wang, Gérasimos Lyberatos, Nathalie Lyczko, Wensheng Qin, John L. Provis and Chunbao Xu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization.

Countries where authors publish in Waste and Biomass Valorization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Waste and Biomass Valorization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Waste and Biomass Valorization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Waste and Biomass Valorization more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025