Value in Health Regional Issues

951 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 951 papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues usually cover Economics and Econometrics (418 papers), General Health Professions (172 papers) and Epidemiology (142 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (330 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (138 papers) and Financing of Health Care Systems and Universal Coverage (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Value in Health Regional Issues are Xiaodong Tan, Haiyan Shao, Xiangxiang Liu, Eskinder Eshetu Ali, Zoltán Kaló, Amit Dang, Carísi Anne Polanczyk, Moses Aikins, Moheddine Younsi and Naushad Mamode Khan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues.

Countries where authors publish in Value in Health Regional Issues

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Value in Health Regional Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Value in Health Regional Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Value in Health Regional Issues more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025