Gynecologic Oncology Reports

1.3k papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports usually cover Reproductive Medicine (450 papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (429 papers) and Oncology (399 papers) specifically the topics of Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (397 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (340 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gynecologic Oncology Reports are Linus Chuang, Julia A. Elvin, Carolyn Nakisige, Rebecca C. Arend, Thomas C. Randall, Melody Xu, Surbhi Grover, Rahel Ghebre, Edward L. Trimble and David W. Doo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Gynecologic Oncology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gynecologic Oncology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gynecologic Oncology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025