Condensed Matter Physics

1.3k papers and 6.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Condensed Matter Physics in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Condensed Matter Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (379 papers), Materials Chemistry (365 papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (253 papers) specifically the topics of Theoretical and Computational Physics (161 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (128 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Condensed Matter Physics are Giancarlo Ruocco, C.W. Outhwaite, Jozef Strečka, M. Holovko, O. Patsahan, Yurij Holovatch, Jaroslav Ilnytskyi, Ralph Kenna, Henderson and I. M. Mryglod.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Condensed Matter Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Condensed Matter Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Condensed Matter Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Condensed Matter Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Condensed Matter Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Condensed Matter Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Condensed Matter Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025