Urology Practice

671 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 671 papers published in Urology Practice in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Urology Practice usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (191 papers), Surgery (172 papers) and General Health Professions (150 papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (101 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (81 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urology Practice are Timothy D. Averch, Amanda North, Christopher Tessier, Bradley A. Erickson, James E. Montie, David Daniels, Charles R. Powell, Stacy Loeb, Allen F. Morey and Béla Dénes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Urology Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Urology Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urology Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Urology Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urology Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urology Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urology Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025