Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline
2012518 citationsE. Ann Gormley, Deborah J. Lightner et al.The Journal of Urologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Tessier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Tessier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Tessier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Tessier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Tessier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Tessier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Tessier. The network helps show where Christopher Tessier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Tessier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Tessier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Tessier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Tessier. Christopher Tessier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Dobbs, Ryan W., Andrew Harris, Christopher Tessier, et al.. (2020). Implementing a patient safety culture survey to identify and target process improvements in academic ambulatory urology practices: a multi-institutional collaborative.. PubMed. 27(1). 10087–10092.2 indexed citations
2.
Ziemba, Justin B., Christopher Tessier, & Andrew Harris. (2020). Patient safety education and perceptions of safety culture in American and Canadian urological residency training programs.. PubMed. 27(6). 10431–10436.1 indexed citations
Tessier, Christopher, et al.. (2015). Quality Metrics in Urology. Urology Practice. 3(1). 12–17.2 indexed citations
11.
Gormley, E. Ann, Deborah J. Lightner, Kathryn L. Burgio, et al.. (2012). Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline. The Journal of Urology. 188(6S). 2455–2463.518 indexed citations breakdown →
Tessier, Christopher, et al.. (2007). National Assessment of Phase 1 Data from the Metal Mining Environmental Effects Monitoring Program.3 indexed citations
14.
Tessier, Christopher, et al.. (2003). The continuity of care record. Organizations unite to create a portable, electronic record for use at transfer points in patients' care.. PubMed. 20(10). 54–6.3 indexed citations
15.
Tessier, Christopher. (1993). The quality of patient care documentation.. PubMed. 12(6). 26, 28–31.
Tessier, Christopher. (1987). [Windsor-Richmond survey. The effect of 7 years of water fluoridation in Windsor, Que. on 6-7-year-old children].. PubMed. 24. 17–23.2 indexed citations
19.
Clark, D. Christopher, et al.. (1987). The final results of the Sherbrooke-Lac Mégantic fluoride varnish study.. PubMed. 53(12). 919–22.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.