Insights the UKSG journal

350 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 350 papers published in Insights the UKSG journal in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Insights the UKSG journal usually cover Information Systems (164 papers), Information Systems and Management (89 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (88 papers) specifically the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (87 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (71 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Insights the UKSG journal are Rick Anderson, Elizabeth S. Charles, David Kernohan, Geoffrey Crossick, Graham Stone, Martin Paul Eve, Paul Ayris, Peter Mandler, William H. Walters and David De Roure.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Insights the UKSG journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Insights the UKSG journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Insights the UKSG journal.

Countries where authors publish in Insights the UKSG journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Insights the UKSG journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Insights the UKSG journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insights the UKSG journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025