Geoffrey Crossick
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- History top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Patrick JoyceHeinz‐Gerhard HauptPaul JohnsonDUNCAN BYTHELLIorwerth ProtheroColin G. PooleyJames H. JohnsonStandish Meacham
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (5 papers)Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Urban StudiesHistoryMuseology
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewBritish Journal of SociologyThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey Crossick
41 papers receiving 756 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Sociology and Political Science 430
- Economics and Econometrics 304
- History 214
- Political Science and International Relations 169
- Urban Studies 137
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Crossick
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Crossick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Crossick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Crossick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Crossick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Crossick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Crossick. The network helps show where Geoffrey Crossick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Crossick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Crossick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Crossick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Crossick. Geoffrey Crossick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | Knowledge Transfer Without Widgets: The Challenge of the Creative Economy | 32 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Die Kleinbürger : eine europäische Sozialgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts | 1 |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | A forgotten class: The petite bourgeoisie in Belgium, 1850-1914 | 2 |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 139 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Geoffrey Crossick
Geoffrey Crossick is a scholar working on Museology, Urban Studies and History, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (137 citations), History (214 citations) and Museology (68 citations). Geoffrey Crossick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Joyce, Heinz‐Gerhard Haupt, Paul Johnson, DUNCAN BYTHELL, Iorwerth Prothero, Colin G. Pooley, James H. Johnson, Standish Meacham, John Garrard and Pat Thane. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, British Journal of Sociology and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.