Countries where authors publish in Tropical Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tropical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tropical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tropical Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tropical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tropical Science.
About Tropical Science
The 599 papers published in Tropical Science in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Tropical Science usually cover Horticulture (18 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (88 papers), Plant Science (309 papers), Forestry (33 papers) and Food Science (94 papers) specifically the topics of Agricultural pest management studies (53 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (47 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (42 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (34 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (33 papers), Potato Plant Research (27 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (25 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tropical Science are Jean‐Frédéric Dubern, Ricardo Ayerza, Wayne Coates, D. Rees, Denis Fargette, J. M. Thresh, G. W. Otim‐Nape, D. L. Jennings, K. R. Bock and Maud M. Swanson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.