Andrew J. Oxenham

14.3k citations
238 papers · 10.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 56

Andrew J. Oxenham

233 papers receiving 9.9k citations

Hit Papers

Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception20022026201020182002200400600

Peers

Andrew J. Oxenham
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 9.5k
  • Speech and Hearing 3.7k
  • Sensory Systems 3.6k
  • Signal Processing 2.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
Replace Brian R. Glasberg with:
Brian R. Glasberg United Kingdom
R. Plomp Netherlands
Robert P. Carlyon United Kingdom
Brian C. J. Moore United Kingdom
Christophe Micheyl United States
Roy D. Patterson United Kingdom
Torsten Dau Denmark
Fan‐Gang Zeng United States
Christopher J. Plack United Kingdom
Barbara Shinn‐Cunningham United States
Andrew J. Oxenham relative to Brian R. Glasberg United Kingdom Brian R. Glasberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Brian R. Glasberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Oxenham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Oxenham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Oxenham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Oxenham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Oxenham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Oxenham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Oxenham. The network helps show where Andrew J. Oxenham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Oxenham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Oxenham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Oxenham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Oxenham. Andrew J. Oxenham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 2
4 2
5 2
6 1
7
The effect of harmonic number and pitch salience on the ability to understand speech-on-speech based on differences in fundamental frequency
1
8 7
9 73
10 32
11 62
12 174
13 17
14 172
15 41
16 62
17
Pitch perception: Frequency selectivity and temporal coding
1
18 153
19 175
20 197

About Andrew J. Oxenham

Andrew J. Oxenham is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 238 papers that have together received 10.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (211 papers), Noise Effects and Management (106 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (94 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (3.6k citations), Speech and Hearing (3.7k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (9.5k citations). Andrew J. Oxenham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Micheyl, Christopher J. Plack, Michael K. Qin, Christopher A. Shera, Joshua G. W. Bernstein, Zachary M. Smith, Bertrand Delgutte, Josh H. McDermott, Heather A. Kreft and John J. Guinan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026