Toronto Journal of Theology

319 papers and 341 indexed citations i.

About

The 319 papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology in the last decades have received a total of 341 indexed citations. Papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (150 papers), Religious studies (129 papers) and Philosophy (102 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (69 papers), Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (49 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toronto Journal of Theology are Niels Henrik Gregersen, J. Wentzel van Huyssteen, John Webster, Galen Watts, John S. Kloppenborg, Roger Haight, Donald K. McKim, Michael R. Desjardins, John Corbett and Nicholas M. Healy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology.

Countries where authors publish in Toronto Journal of Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toronto Journal of Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toronto Journal of Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toronto Journal of Theology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025