Theory and applications of categories

819 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 819 papers published in Theory and applications of categories in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Theory and applications of categories usually cover Artificial Intelligence (399 papers), Mathematical Physics (363 papers) and Geometry and Topology (323 papers) specifically the topics of Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (352 papers), Topic Modeling (278 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory and applications of categories are Dominique Bourn, John C. Baez, G. M. Kelly, George Janelidze, Mark Weber, Alissa S. Crans, Stephen Lack, Peter E. Clark, Marco Grandis and Ido Dagan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theory and applications of categories

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory and applications of categories. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory and applications of categories.

Countries where authors publish in Theory and applications of categories

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory and applications of categories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory and applications of categories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and applications of categories more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025