˜The œThomist

1.0k papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in ˜The œThomist in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œThomist usually cover Philosophy (716 papers), History (188 papers) and Religious studies (156 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Philosophy and Theology (527 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (205 papers) and Catholicism and Religious Studies (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œThomist are Suzanne Uniacke, William A. Wallace, John Deely, D. Alan Shewmon, Thomas M. Osborne, Brian J. Shanley, Germain Grisez, John Finnis, Gregory M. Reichberg and Steven A. Long.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œThomist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œThomist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œThomist.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œThomist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œThomist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œThomist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œThomist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025