Thomas M. Osborne
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Water Science and Technology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tim WheelerAndrew J. ChallinorEd HawkinsChun Kit HoM. W. ShawNigel W. ArnellSimon N. GoslingSally Brown
- Topics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology (12 papers)Climate variability and models (6 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Osborne
27 papers receiving 810 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Global and Planetary Change 407
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 265
- Plant Science 220
- Atmospheric Science 152
- Water Science and Technology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Osborne
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Osborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Osborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Osborne. The network helps show where Thomas M. Osborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Osborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Osborne. Thomas M. Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Addressing the uncertainties associated in assessing the impacts of climate change on agricultural crop production using model simulations | 1 |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 89 | |
| 5 | Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines on Whether to See God Is to Love Him | 1 |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 112 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 110 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | The Threefold Referral of Acts to the Ultimate End in Thomas Aquinas and His Commentators | 3 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | How good is the Hadley Centre climate model? Research at CGAM on identifying and understanding model systematic errors: 1999-2002 - CGAM/NCAS Report | 3 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas M. Osborne
Thomas M. Osborne is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Classics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (12 papers), Climate variability and models (6 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (407 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (265 citations) and Soil Science (99 citations). Thomas M. Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Wheeler, Andrew J. Challinor, Ed Hawkins, Chun Kit Ho, M. W. Shaw, Nigel W. Arnell, Simon N. Gosling, Sally Brown, Timothy J. Osborn and Jason Lowe. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Climate Change, Climatic Change and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.