The Sixties
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- History
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Communism, Protests, Social MovementsAmerican Political and Social DynamicsRace, History, and American Society
In The Last Decade
The Sixties
130 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 459
- Political Science and International Relations 169
- History 118
- Clinical Psychology 92
- Social Psychology 66
Countries where authors publish in The Sixties
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Sixties. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Sixties with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Sixties more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Sixties
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Sixties. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Sixties.
About The Sixties
The 223 papers published in The Sixties in the last decades have received a total of 840 indexed citations . Papers published in The Sixties usually cover History (74 papers), Music (16 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 papers) specifically the topics of Communism, Protests, Social Movements (49 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (45 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Sixties are Michael E. Staub, Lee Bernstein, David Farber, David Greenberg, Jeremy Varon, David Suisman, Daniel Immerwahr, Katherine O’Sullivan See, Todd Gitlin and Staughton Lynd.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.