˜The œPublic interest

294 papers and 2.6k indexed citations

About

The 294 papers published in ˜The œPublic interest in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œPublic interest usually cover Education (56 papers), Sociology and Political Science (18 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (16 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (16 papers), Education Systems and Policy (16 papers) and School Choice and Performance (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œPublic interest are Lester C. Thurow, Martin Feldstein, James J. Heckman, Nathan Glazer, Lawrence M. Mead, Thomas Sowell, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Richard Alba, John E. Chubb and Charles Murray.

In The Last Decade

˜The œPublic interest

100 papers receiving 700 citations

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œPublic interest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œPublic interest. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œPublic interest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œPublic interest more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ˜The œPublic interest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œPublic interest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œPublic interest.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026