Asia policy

536 papers and 2.3k indexed citations

About

The 536 papers published in Asia policy in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia policy usually cover Political Science and International Relations (270 papers), Sociology and Political Science (184 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (63 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (92 papers), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (61 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia policy are Michael Clarke, Wendy Leutert, John Williamson, William W. Grimes, Scott Kennedy, C. Christine Fair, Sylvia Schwaag Serger, Yasheng Huang, Thomas S. Wilkins and Trevor Houser.

In The Last Decade

Asia policy

359 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Countries where authors publish in Asia policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia policy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Asia policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026