The Neuroscientist

1.4k papers and 85.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in The Neuroscientist in the last decades have received a total of 85.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Neuroscientist usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (633 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (453 papers) and Molecular Biology (411 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (364 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (163 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Neuroscientist are Mohamed L. Seghier, Danielle S. Bassett, Edward T. Bullmore, Michael V. Sofroniew, David E.J. Linden, Jessica R. Andrews‐Hanna, Adam R. Aron, Simone Shamay‐Tsoory, Charlotte J. Stagg and Michael A. Nitsche.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Neuroscientist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Neuroscientist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Neuroscientist.

Countries where authors publish in The Neuroscientist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Neuroscientist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Neuroscientist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Neuroscientist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025