The Mental Lexicon

279 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 279 papers published in The Mental Lexicon in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Mental Lexicon usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (174 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (162 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (153 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (127 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Mental Lexicon are R. Harald Baayen, Allan Paivio, Alec Marantz, Lee H. Wurm, Linnaea Stockall, Chris Westbury, Stefan Τh. Gries, Gretchen Sunderman, Yury Shtyrov and John W. Schwieter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Mental Lexicon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Mental Lexicon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Mental Lexicon.

Countries where authors publish in The Mental Lexicon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Mental Lexicon. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Mental Lexicon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Mental Lexicon more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025