The Journal of Clinical Monitoring

590 papers and 9.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 590 papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring usually cover Surgery (262 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (162 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (157 papers) specifically the topics of Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (172 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (124 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring are Nassib G. Chamoun, John W. Severinghaus, Jeffrey C. Sigl, Igor M. Gladstone, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Steven M. Pincus, Joseph F. Kelleher, Frank E. Block, Nikolaus Gravenstein and Mark Yelderman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Clinical Monitoring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Clinical Monitoring more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025