The Family Journal

1.7k papers and 12.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Family Journal in the last decades have received a total of 12.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Family Journal usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.0k papers), Social Psychology (793 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (446 papers) specifically the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (450 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (301 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Family Journal are Michael W. Wiederman, Len Sperry, Lisa M. Hooper, David M. Kleist, Daniel Eckstein, Paul Giblin, Anita Thomas, Marsha Wiggins Frame, Alberto Alegre and Christine E. Murray.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Family Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Family Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Family Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Family Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Family Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Family Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Family Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025