Optical Review

2.4k papers and 15.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Optical Review in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Optical Review usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.1k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (955 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (669 papers) specifically the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (425 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (238 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (225 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Optical Review are Susumu Sato, Junji Ohtsubo, Hisao Kikuta, Ichirou Yamaguchi, Yukio Yamada, Mitsuo Ikeda, Toyohiko Yatagai, Hiroshi Yoshikawa, Kenichi Hibino and Masahiro Yamaguchi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Optical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Optical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Optical Review.

Countries where authors publish in Optical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Optical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Optical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025