Countries where authors publish in Current Nanoscience
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Nanoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Nanoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Nanoscience more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Nanoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Nanoscience.
About Current Nanoscience
The 1.5k papers published in Current Nanoscience in the last decades have received a total of 18.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Nanoscience usually cover Pharmaceutical Science (102 papers), Biomaterials (210 papers), Materials Chemistry (505 papers), Biomedical Engineering (357 papers) and Polymers and Plastics (105 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (107 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (91 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (72 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (67 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (64 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (54 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (54 papers) and Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Nanoscience are Hua Chun Zeng, Yong Zhou, Oleg V. Salata, Lee Jia, Mahendra Rai, Avinash P. Ingle, Aniket Gade, Vinod Labhasetwar, Jaspreet K. Vasir and Gerardo F. Goya.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.