The Application of Clinical Genetics

293 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 293 papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (120 papers), Genetics (91 papers) and Physiology (32 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (25 papers), Congenital heart defects research (18 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Application of Clinical Genetics are Lynne M. Bird, Thomas Gasser, Anthony O. Fedele, Berit Kerner, Sabina Gallati, Sulman Basit, Raili Kauppinen, Elena Pischik, Anwar Ullah and Ilene S. Ruhoy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics.

Countries where authors publish in The Application of Clinical Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Application of Clinical Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Application of Clinical Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Application of Clinical Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025