Islets
- Surgery top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Physiology
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Research
In The Last Decade
Islets
389 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Surgery 5.5k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
- Genetics 2.7k
- Physiology 990
Countries where authors publish in Islets
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Islets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Islets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Islets more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Islets
This network shows the impact of papers published in Islets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Islets.
About Islets
The 399 papers published in Islets in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Islets usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (198 papers), Surgery (359 papers) and Genetics (168 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic function and diabetes (356 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (149 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Islets are Manami Hara, Pieter In 'T Veld, Abraham Kim, Kevin Miller, Marjan Slak Rupnik, Jurij Dolenšek, Andraž Stožer, Donald Steiner, German Kilimnik and Guy A. Rutter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.