Teksty Drugie
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Topics
- Central European Literary StudiesLanguage and CulturePolish Historical and Cultural Studies
In The Last Decade
Teksty Drugie
361 papers receiving 663 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Anthropology 454
- Philosophy 356
- Political Science and International Relations 340
- Sociology and Political Science 255
- Linguistics and Language 230
Countries where authors publish in Teksty Drugie
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teksty Drugie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teksty Drugie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teksty Drugie more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Teksty Drugie
This network shows the impact of papers published in Teksty Drugie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teksty Drugie.
About Teksty Drugie
The 1.0k papers published in Teksty Drugie in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Teksty Drugie usually cover Linguistics and Language (413 papers), Anthropology (504 papers) and Philosophy (346 papers) specifically the topics of Central European Literary Studies (500 papers), Language and Culture (413 papers) and Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (372 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teksty Drugie are Ewa Domańska, Ryszard Nycz, Anna Wierzbicka, Tomasz Rakowski, Clare Cavanagh, Ewa M. Thompson, Gianni Vattimo, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Elżbieta Tabakowska and Joanna Żylińska.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.