Johnson Matthey Technology Review

374 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 374 papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review usually cover Materials Chemistry (104 papers), Mechanical Engineering (72 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (57 papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (42 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (19 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Johnson Matthey Technology Review are Edward Rosenberg, M. V. Twigg, A.V. Bridgwater, Sumit Vyas, E. Hugh Stitt, Deepak N. Kapoor, James Sherwood, J. W. Arblaster, Billy Wu and John Dunkley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Johnson Matthey Technology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Johnson Matthey Technology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johnson Matthey Technology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025