Technology and Health Care

2.6k papers and 19.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Technology and Health Care in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Technology and Health Care usually cover Biomedical Engineering (584 papers), Surgery (553 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (261 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (126 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (125 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technology and Health Care are P. Rüegsegger, Hans Jörg Häuselmann, Andres Laib, Amit Gefen, Fergal J. O’Brien, Neil B. Ingels, Konrad E. Bloch, Roger Ho, Melvyn Zhang and Sharmila Majumdar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Technology and Health Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technology and Health Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technology and Health Care.

Countries where authors publish in Technology and Health Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technology and Health Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technology and Health Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology and Health Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025