The Clinical Neuropsychologist

2.0k papers and 54.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist in the last decades have received a total of 54.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (779 papers), Epidemiology (703 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (560 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (668 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (489 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Clinical Neuropsychologist are Glenn J. Larrabee, Grant L. Iverson, Kyle B. Boone, Ralph H. B. Benedict, John R. Crawford, Jason Brandt, David C. Howell, David J. Schretlen, Jerry J. Sweet and Scott R. Millis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist.

Countries where authors publish in The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Clinical Neuropsychologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025