Studia Musicologica

404 papers and 693 indexed citations i.

About

The 404 papers published in Studia Musicologica in the last decades have received a total of 693 indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Musicologica usually cover Music (207 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (74 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (54 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (167 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (104 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Musicologica are János Maróthy, Richard Middleton, Trevor Wishart, Graham Vulliamy, John Shepherd, Otto Erich Deutsch, J. H. Kwabena Nketia, James Lull, Laurence Picken and Richard K. Norton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Musicologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Musicologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Musicologica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Musicologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Musicologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Musicologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Musicologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025