Social Theory & Health

466 papers and 7.6k indexed citations

About

The 466 papers published in Social Theory & Health in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Theory & Health usually cover General Health Professions (223 papers), Sociology and Political Science (134 papers) and Clinical Psychology (81 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health and Patient Involvement (74 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (56 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Theory & Health are Deborah Lupton, Graham Scambler, Lee F. Monaghan, Iliya Gutin, Nikolas Rose, Lucy Aphramor, Emma Rich, Vinh‐Kim Nguyen, John Evans and Simon J. Williams.

In The Last Decade

Social Theory & Health

434 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Social Theory & Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Theory & Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Theory & Health.

Countries where authors publish in Social Theory & Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Theory & Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Theory & Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Theory & Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026