Perspectives in Public Health

794 papers and 10.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 794 papers published in Perspectives in Public Health in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Perspectives in Public Health usually cover General Health Professions (315 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (145 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (93 papers) specifically the topics of Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (75 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (59 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Perspectives in Public Health are Stephen Clift, Hilary Bungay, Mark Dooris, P. Almond, Pietro Amenta, Enkhjargal Batbaatar, Javkhlanbayar Dorjdagva, Bent Egberg Mikkelsen, Helen J. Chatterjee and Tim Townshend.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Perspectives in Public Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Perspectives in Public Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Perspectives in Public Health.

Countries where authors publish in Perspectives in Public Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Perspectives in Public Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Perspectives in Public Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives in Public Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025