Stewart Postharvest Review

220 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 220 papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review usually cover Plant Science (120 papers), Food Science (40 papers) and Insect Science (23 papers) specifically the topics of Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (69 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (39 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stewart Postharvest Review are J. N. Govil, S. Mangaraj, Vijaya Raghavan, Amani S. Awaad, S. D. Kulkarni, Tridib Kumar Goswami, Joseph L. Smilanick, D. Obeng‐Ofori, Yaguang Luo and Qiang He.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review.

Countries where authors publish in Stewart Postharvest Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stewart Postharvest Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stewart Postharvest Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Postharvest Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025