Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)
272 papers
receiving
18.8k citations
Peers
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
Statistics and Probability3.4k
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty1.5k
Applied Psychology762
Management Science and Operations Research1.7k
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management1.3k
Replace Methodology with:
MethodologyUnited States
Practical assessment, research & evaluationUnited States
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological ScienceUnited States
Annual Review of EconomicsUnited States
Annual Review of Statistics and Its ApplicationUnited States
Communication Methods and MeasuresUnited States
Health Services and Outcomes Research MethodologyUnited States
Annual Review of Clinical PsychologyUnited States
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational BehaviorUnited States
European Review of Social PsychologyUnited States
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)relative toMethodologyUnited StatesMethodology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Methodology · 1×
×2.93k/1kSP
×5.31k/282SPU
×0.8762/910AP
×1.32k/1kMSOR
×0.61k/2kOBHRM
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician).
About Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)
The 305 papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) in the last decades have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) usually cover Statistics and Probability (164 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (51 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (54 papers), Economics and Econometrics (72 papers) and Finance (17 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (72 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (65 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (38 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (32 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (31 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (27 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (24 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) are Freda Kemp, Lada Mitchell, Stephen P. Brooks, Chris Brunsdon, Stewart Fotheringham, Martin Charlton, D. V. Lindley, D. N. Joanes, Kevin McConway and Anthony O’Hagan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.