Statistical Science
About
In The Last Decade
Statistical Science
957 papers receiving 83.5k citations
Fields of papers published in Statistical Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Statistical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Statistical Science.
Countries where authors publish in Statistical Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Statistical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Statistical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistical Science more than expected).
- Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences (1992)
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy (1986)
- Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (1989)
- Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward (2010)
- Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors (1999)
- Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) (2001)
- Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties (1996)
- Generalized Additive Models (1986)
- Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion (2001)
- Bootstrap confidence intervals (1996)
- Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (1992)
- A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law (1995)
- Local Regression: Automatic Kernel Carpentry (1993)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.