Starinar
- Topics
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryHistorical and Archaeological Studies
In The Last Decade
Starinar
150 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Archeology 424
- Paleontology 222
- Anthropology 94
- History 81
- Oceanography 69
Countries where authors publish in Starinar
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Starinar. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Starinar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Starinar more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Starinar
This network shows the impact of papers published in Starinar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Starinar.
About Starinar
The 229 papers published in Starinar in the last decades have received a total of 570 indexed citations . Papers published in Starinar usually cover Archeology (203 papers), Archeology (20 papers) and Classics (36 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (171 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (92 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Starinar are Vesna Dimitrijević, Dušan Borić, Jasna Vuković, Marko Porčić, Dragana Antonović, Miljana Radivojević, Michel Kazanski, Barry Molloy, Miroslav Marić and Nada Štrbac.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.