Social Science Japan Journal

626 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 626 papers published in Social Science Japan Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Science Japan Journal usually cover Sociology and Political Science (256 papers), Cultural Studies (237 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (136 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (231 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (53 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Japan Journal are Yūji Genda, Andrew Gordon, Pepper D. Culpepper, Keiichi Sato, Pasuk Phongpaichit, Glenda S. Roberts, Steve R. Entrich, Rumi Sakamoto, David T. Johnson and Harald Conrad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Science Japan Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Japan Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Japan Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Social Science Japan Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Japan Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Japan Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Japan Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025