SPE Formation Evaluation

614 papers and 17.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 614 papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 17.6k indexed citations. Papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation usually cover Ocean Engineering (451 papers), Mechanical Engineering (419 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (170 papers) specifically the topics of Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (410 papers), Advanced Techniques in Reservoir Management (267 papers) and Drilling and Well Engineering (212 papers). The most active scholars publishing in SPE Formation Evaluation are R. Raghavan, Stanley Jones, Erdal Özkan, Daniel J. Soeder, A.C. Bumb, C.R. McKee, Albert C. Reynolds, Roland N. Horne, J. A. Ayoub and Larry W. Lake.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation.

Countries where authors publish in SPE Formation Evaluation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in SPE Formation Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in SPE Formation Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SPE Formation Evaluation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025