Sociological Spectrum

1.0k papers and 13.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.0k papers published in Sociological Spectrum in the last decades have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Sociological Spectrum usually cover Sociology and Political Science (708 papers), Gender Studies (153 papers) and General Health Professions (140 papers) specifically the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (110 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (87 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sociological Spectrum are Nicole E. Rader, David C. May, Richard Tewksbury, Terri LeMoyne, Tom Buchanan, Craig J. Forsyth, Susan A. Dumais, Duane A. Gill, Jason A. Ford and Liam Downey.

In The Last Decade

Sociological Spectrum

915 papers receiving 11.9k citations

Countries where authors publish in Sociological Spectrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sociological Spectrum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sociological Spectrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociological Spectrum more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Sociological Spectrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sociological Spectrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sociological Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026